COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE & COMPOSITE STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO STATIC & DYNAMIC LOADS
| Author(s) | : | MOHAMMED IMRAN, SHAIK ABDULLA, S.M.HASMI |
| Institution | : | P.G. Student, Department Of Civil Engineering, KBN Engineering College, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India |
| Published In | : | Vol. 4, Issue 8 — August 2017 |
| Page No. | : | 238-243 |
| Domain | : | Engineering |
| Type | : | Research Paper |
| ISSN (Online) | : | 2348-4470 |
| ISSN (Print) | : | 2348-6406 |
Steel-Concrete composite developments are these days winding up plainly extremely main streamattributable to their favorable circumstances over customary Concrete and Steel developments. concrete structures aremassive and bestow more seismic weight and less avoidance while Steel structures teach more deflection and ductilityto the structure, which is valuable in opposing earthquake strengths. Composite Construction consolidates the betterproperties of both steel and concrete. Therefore the point of present investigation is to look at seismic execution ofG+6, G+12, G+18 without shear wall and G+18 with shear wall for reinforced concrete and composite structuresarranged in quake zone III. All frames are design under same gravity loading. Response spectrum method is used forinvestigation seismic examination. E-tabs programming is utilized and the outcomes are thought about. Relativeexamination presumes that composite structures are most appropriate in opposing seismic strengths contrasted withthat RCC structures. These structures are most appropriate in range of high seismic powers. Starting investment incomposite structures is high contrasted with that of RC structures from material cost perspective.
MOHAMMED IMRAN, SHAIK ABDULLA, S.M.HASMI, “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE & COMPOSITE STRUCTURES SUBJECTED TO STATIC & DYNAMIC LOADS”, International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD), Vol. 4, Issue 8, pp. 238-243, August 2017.
