REVIEW OF COMPARISON BETWEEN CLOSED HOLLOW STEEL SECTION AND CONVENTIONAL STEEL SECTION FOR FOOT OVER BRIDGE WITH DIFFERENT TRUSS CONFIGURATION
| Author(s) | : | SahilS.Kureshi, HirenG.Desai |
| Institution | : | M.Tech. (Structural Engineer), DharmsinhDesai University, |
| Published In | : | Vol. 4, Issue 11 — November 2017 |
| Page No. | : | 214-217 |
| Domain | : | Engineering |
| Type | : | Research Paper |
| ISSN (Online) | : | 2348-4470 |
| ISSN (Print) | : | 2348-6406 |
—generally the foot over bridges are made up of different steel sections and these steel sections are eitherconventional steel sections or closed hollow section. For instance, angle section, circular hollow steel section (CHS),rectangular hollow section (RHS) and square hollow section (SHS). An exertion has been done here to calculatediscrepancy in weight between conventional steel section and closed hollow section with different truss configurationslike Pratt truss, Howe truss and Warren truss. Even an attempt has been done here to analyze and design of foot overbridge with multiple truss configuration and all the datas are checked for both steel sections using draft code IS800:2007,IRC:SP:56-200 and IS 806 for limit state design. Manual calculation is verified by software STAAD PROV8i.The outcome received by both steel sections is elevated in form of consumption of steel with different heights, spansand configurations.
SahilS.Kureshi, HirenG.Desai, “REVIEW OF COMPARISON BETWEEN CLOSED HOLLOW STEEL SECTION AND CONVENTIONAL STEEL SECTION FOR FOOT OVER BRIDGE WITH DIFFERENT TRUSS CONFIGURATION”, International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development (IJAERD), Vol. 4, Issue 11, pp. 214-217, November 2017.
